<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aptitude 0.5.0 (aka Aptitude-gtk) released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.milliways.fr/2008/11/12/aptitude-050-aka-aptitude-gtk-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.milliways.fr/2008/11/12/aptitude-050-aka-aptitude-gtk-released/</link>
	<description>Obey Arthur Liu . blog()</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:09:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leonardo</title>
		<link>http://www.milliways.fr/2008/11/12/aptitude-050-aka-aptitude-gtk-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliways.fr/?p=63#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>Hi, I don&#039;t know if this feature is already implemented, but I would like to see an option to filter packages by date of  installation.  So I could see the last application I installed and the first ones too.
Other:  sort packages by last updated and more downloaded on each category.  So when I go to install a package I can have a parameter to choose which one install.

Wait an answer, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I don&#8217;t know if this feature is already implemented, but I would like to see an option to filter packages by date of  installation.  So I could see the last application I installed and the first ones too.<br />
Other:  sort packages by last updated and more downloaded on each category.  So when I go to install a package I can have a parameter to choose which one install.</p>
<p>Wait an answer, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Np237</title>
		<link>http://www.milliways.fr/2008/11/12/aptitude-050-aka-aptitude-gtk-released/comment-page-1/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>Np237</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliways.fr/?p=63#comment-934</guid>
		<description>@6
The problem is that the PackageKit developers base the feature set on the lowest common denominator (aka RPM), and they refuse to introduce features (especially debconf) that are critical for a Debian package manager.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@6<br />
The problem is that the PackageKit developers base the feature set on the lowest common denominator (aka RPM), and they refuse to introduce features (especially debconf) that are critical for a Debian package manager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wodny</title>
		<link>http://www.milliways.fr/2008/11/12/aptitude-050-aka-aptitude-gtk-released/comment-page-1/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>wodny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliways.fr/?p=63#comment-930</guid>
		<description>@8
OK, now I&#039;m calm and the future is bright :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@8<br />
OK, now I&#8217;m calm and the future is bright <img src='http://www.milliways.fr/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obey Arthur Liu</title>
		<link>http://www.milliways.fr/2008/11/12/aptitude-050-aka-aptitude-gtk-released/comment-page-1/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>Obey Arthur Liu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliways.fr/?p=63#comment-916</guid>
		<description>@7
The next experimental release will be separated. It really is an experimental release..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@7<br />
The next experimental release will be separated. It really is an experimental release..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wodny</title>
		<link>http://www.milliways.fr/2008/11/12/aptitude-050-aka-aptitude-gtk-released/comment-page-1/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>wodny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliways.fr/?p=63#comment-915</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a very bad idea to put this thing in the repo as &quot;aptitude&quot;. It should have a separate package called &quot;aptitude-gtk&quot;. I can see Debian is planning to force me to install dependencies like GTK+ which I will never use, because not every Linux is a desktop installation(!), as some non-clicking users can remember. And notice, the --no-gui swich is no solution in this case. I feel like something very useful is being destroyed. Make a separate package, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a very bad idea to put this thing in the repo as &#8220;aptitude&#8221;. It should have a separate package called &#8220;aptitude-gtk&#8221;. I can see Debian is planning to force me to install dependencies like GTK+ which I will never use, because not every Linux is a desktop installation(!), as some non-clicking users can remember. And notice, the &#8211;no-gui swich is no solution in this case. I feel like something very useful is being destroyed. Make a separate package, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flows</title>
		<link>http://www.milliways.fr/2008/11/12/aptitude-050-aka-aptitude-gtk-released/comment-page-1/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>flows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliways.fr/?p=63#comment-913</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; How could it be ? o0 Aptitude and APT are too different from the main platform targeted by PackageKit,
&gt;&gt; Fedora RPMs.
AFAIK, backends for packagekit supporting Debian package format are in development. Since this is really a useful thing (ever tried it? easier and more reliable when updating for it does not rely on root rights (-&gt; DBus/PolicyKit, I think) and a graphical environment, so if your X-Server crashes for whatever reason, the update continues as planned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; How could it be ? o0 Aptitude and APT are too different from the main platform targeted by PackageKit,<br />
&gt;&gt; Fedora RPMs.<br />
AFAIK, backends for packagekit supporting Debian package format are in development. Since this is really a useful thing (ever tried it? easier and more reliable when updating for it does not rely on root rights (-&gt; DBus/PolicyKit, I think) and a graphical environment, so if your X-Server crashes for whatever reason, the update continues as planned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petteri</title>
		<link>http://www.milliways.fr/2008/11/12/aptitude-050-aka-aptitude-gtk-released/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Petteri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliways.fr/?p=63#comment-911</guid>
		<description>Congratulations! Hopefully this will also keep up with the aptitude in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations! Hopefully this will also keep up with the aptitude in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peng&#8217;s links for Wednesday, 12 November &#171; I&#8217;m Just an Avatar</title>
		<link>http://www.milliways.fr/2008/11/12/aptitude-050-aka-aptitude-gtk-released/comment-page-1/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>Peng&#8217;s links for Wednesday, 12 November &#171; I&#8217;m Just an Avatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliways.fr/?p=63#comment-910</guid>
		<description>[...] Arthur Liu: Aptitude 0.5.0 (aka Aptitude-gtk) released. If you love using Aptitude for installing software on Linux you may want to check out the version [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Arthur Liu: Aptitude 0.5.0 (aka Aptitude-gtk) released. If you love using Aptitude for installing software on Linux you may want to check out the version [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obey Arthur Liu</title>
		<link>http://www.milliways.fr/2008/11/12/aptitude-050-aka-aptitude-gtk-released/comment-page-1/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>Obey Arthur Liu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliways.fr/?p=63#comment-909</guid>
		<description>@2
How could it be ? o0 Aptitude and APT are too different from the main platform targeted by PackageKit, Fedora RPMs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@2<br />
How could it be ? o0 Aptitude and APT are too different from the main platform targeted by PackageKit, Fedora RPMs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foo</title>
		<link>http://www.milliways.fr/2008/11/12/aptitude-050-aka-aptitude-gtk-released/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliways.fr/?p=63#comment-908</guid>
		<description>Shame this wasn&#039;t done as part of PackageKit instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame this wasn&#8217;t done as part of PackageKit instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
